Comparison of pronga and nasal mask in non-invasive ventilation in prematures: a literature review
Main Article Content
Abstract
Introdução: Ventilatory support performed in preterm infants can be invasive (through an artificial area); or non-invasive, through interfaces that preserve the physiological airway Objective: To verify the safety and effectiveness of using the nasal mask compared to the nasal prong, in relation to NIV failure, occurrence of nasal trauma,
non-invasive support time and occurrence of bronchopulmonary dysplasia (BPD). Data source: Articles published in the last ten years in the databases indexed in PubMed / Medline, SciELO, Lilacs and Cochrane were included in the study, using the main keywords and their respective descriptors in English. Summary of the findings: Five
international articles were found, comparing nasal prongs and nasal masks, showing a reduction in trauma injury in premature infants and a reduction in failure of noninvasive ventilation. Conclusion: The nasal mask is a promising alternative, as it behaves similarly to the nasal prong (in relation to vital sign parameters), or superior to this when considering nasal and facial trauma, which reduces exposure of the premature infant to painful events, considered harmful to the extrauterine development of his central nervous system.
Downloads
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
References
1. Souse NFC, Bonfim SFSSF, Vasconcelos MGL, Bezerra JLO, Silva DVC, Leal LP. Prevalence of nasal septum injury in premature infants using nasal prongs. Esc Enferm USP, 2013;47(6):1285-90
2. Natarajan G, Shankaran S.Short- and LongTerm Outcomes of Moderate and Late Preterm Infants. AmJPerinatol. 2016 Feb;33(3):305-17. doi: 10.1055/s-0035-1571150. Epub 2016 Jan 20.
3. Afjeh SA, Sabzehei MK, Khoshnood Shariati M, Shamshiri AR, Esmaili F. Evaluation of Initial Respiratory Support Strategies in VLBW Neonates with RDS. ArchIranMed. 2017 Mar;20(3):158-164. doi: 0172003/AIM.008.
4. Levesque BM, Burnham L, Cardoza N, Adams M, Cohen R, Mirochnick M, Fujii A, Sinha B, Improving Respiratory Support Practices to Reduce Chronic Lung Disease in Premature Infants. PediatrQualSaf. 2019 Aug 9;4(4):e193. doi:10.1097/pq9.0000000000000193. eCollection 2019 Jul-Aug.
5. Flanagan KA. Noninvasive Ventilation in Premature Neonates. AdvNeonatalCare 2016 Apr;16(2):91-8. doi: 10.1097/ANC.0273.
6. DePaoli AG, Davis PG, Faber B, Morley CJ. Devices and pressure sources for administration of nasal continuous positive airway pressure (NCPAP)in preterm neonates. CochraneDatabaseSystRev. 2008 Jan 23;(1):CD002977. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD002977.pub2.
7. Trevisanuto D, Grazzina N, Doglioni N, Ferrarese P, Marzari F, Zanardo V. A new device for administration of continuous positive airway pressure in preterm infants: comparison with standard nasal CPAP continuous positive airway pressure system. Intensive Care Med. 2005 Jun;31(6):859-64. Epub 2005 Apr 19.
8. Antunes JCP, Nascimento MAL, Gomes AVO, Araujo MC. Instalação do CPAP nasal: identificando a dor do recém-nato como um cuidado de enfermagem. Rev Enferm UFPE. 2010 jan-mar.;4(1):142-48.
9. Ota NT, Davidson J, Guinsburg R. Early nasal injury resulting from the use of nasal prongs in preterm infants with very low birth weight: a pilot study. Revista Brasileira de Terapia Intensiva 2013;25:245-250.
10. Bonfim SFSF, Vasconcelos MGL, Sousa NFC, Silva DVC, Leal LP. Lesão de septo nasal em neonatos pré-termo no uso de prongas nasais. Rev. Latino-Am. Enfermagem. 2014;22(5):826-33.
11. Newnam KM, McGrath JM, Estes T, Jallo N, Salyer J, Bass WT. An integrative review of skin breakdown in the preterm infant associated with nasal continuous positive airway pressure. J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs. 2013 Sep-Oct;42(5):508-16. doi: 10.1111/1552-6909.12233. Epub 2013 Sep 4.
12 .Green EA, Dawson JA, Davis PG, DePaol AG, Roberts CT. Assessment of resistance of nasal continuous positive airway pressure interfaces. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2019 Sep;104(5):F535-F539. doi: 10.1136/archdischild-2018-315838. Epub 2018 Dec 19.
13. DePaoli AG, Morley CJ, Davis PG, Lau R, Hingeley E. Invitro comparison of nasal continuous positive airway pressure devices for neonates. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2002 Jul;87(1):F42-5.
14. Osman M, Elsharkawy A, AbdelHady H. Assessment of pain during application of nasal continuous positive airway pressure and heated, humidified highflow nasal cannulae in preterm infants. JPerinatol. 2015 Apr;35(4):263-7. doi: 10.1038/jp.2014.206. Epub 2014, Nov 27.
15. Yong SC, Chen SJ, Boo NY. Incidence of nasal trauma associated with nasal prong versus nasal mask during continuous positive airway pressure treatment in very low birthweight infants: a randomised control study. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2005 Nov;90(6):F480-3. Epub 2005 Jun 7.
16. Kieran EA, Twomey AR, Molloy EJ, Murphy JF, O'Donnell CP. Randomized trial of prongs or mask for nasal continuous positive airway pressure in preterm infants. Pediatrics. 2012,130(5):e1170-6.
17. Goel S, Mondkar J, Panchal H,Hegde D, Utture A,Manerkar S, Nasal Mask Versus Nasal Prongs for Delivering Nasal Continuous Positive Airway Pressure in Preterm Infants with Respiratory Distress: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Indian Pediatr. 2015,52(12):1035-40.
18. Say B, Kanmaz Kutman HG, Oguz SS, Oncel MY, Arayici S, Canpolat FE, Uras N, Karahan S. Binasal Prong versus Nasal Mask for Applying CPAP to Preterm Infants: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Neonatology. 2016;109(4):258-64.
19. Chandrasekaran A, Thukral A, Jeeva Sankar M, Agarwal R, Paul VK, Deorari AK. Nasal masks or binasal prongs for delivering continuous positive airway pressure in preterm neonates-a randomised trial. Eur J Pediatr. 2017;176(3):379-386.
20. Bashir T, Murki S, Kiran S, Reddy VK, Oleti TP. 'Nasal mask' in comparison with 'nasal prongs' or 'rotation of nasal mask with nasal prongs' reduce the incidence of nasal injury in preterm neonates supported on nasal continuous positive airway pressure (nCPAP): A randomized controlled trial. PLoS One. 2019,14(1):e0211476.
21. Brix N, Sellmer A, Jensen MS, Vad Pedersen L, Henriksen TB. Predictors for an unsuccessful Intubation-Surfactant-Extubation procedure: a cohort study. BMC Pediatrics. 2014,14:155.
22. Wright CJ, Sherlock LG, Sahni R, Polin RA. Preventing Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Failure: Evidence-Based and Physiologically Sound Practices from Delivery Room to the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit. Clin Perinatol. 2018 Jun;45(2):257-271.
23. Ottinger D, Hicks J, Wilson S, Sperber K, Power K. The Pressure Is On: Neonatal Skin and Nasal Continuous Positive Airway Pressure. Adv Neonatal Care. 2016;16(6):420-423.
24. Hogeling M, Fardin SR, Frieden IJ, Wargon O. Forehead pressure necrosis in neonates following continuous positive airway pressure. Pediatr Dermatol. 2012;29(1):45-8.
25. Tauzin M, Durrmeyer X. Managing neonatal pain in the era of non-invasive respiratory support. Semin Fetal Neonatal Med. 2019 Aug;24(4):101004.
26. Xie LH. Hydrocolloid dressing in preventing nasal traumasecondary to nasal continuous positive airway pressure in preterm infants. World J Emerg Med. 2014;5(3):218-22. doi: 10.5847/wjem.j.1920-8642.2014.03.011.
27. Tracy MK, Berkelhamer SK. Bronchopulmonary Dysplasia and Pulmonary Outcomes of Prematurity. Pediatr Ann. 2019;48(4):e148-e153.
28. Celik M, Bulbul A, Uslu S, Dursun M, Guran O, Kıray Bas E, Arslan S, Zubarioglu U. A comparison of the effects of invasive mechanic ventilation/surfactant therapy and non-invasive nasal-continuous positive airway pressure in preterm newborns. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2018 Dec;31(24):3225-3231.
29. Niemarkt HJ, Hütten MC, Kramer BW. Surfactant for Respiratory Distress Syndrome: New Ideas on aFamiliar Drug with Innovative Applications Neonatology 2017;111:408-414.
30. Jasani B, Ismail A, Rao S, Patole S. Effectiveness and safety of nasal mask versus binasal prongs for providing continuous positive airway pressure in preterm infants: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Pediatr Pulmonol. 2018;53(7):987-992.